NC State A.F.L. – C.I.O.

Now is the time to say ‘Yes’

“When I look at the years we’ve been fighting for health care and what it means for working families to start down the path of comprehensive reform, I know the time to step forward is now,” said AFL-CIO President Rich Trumka in a video message to working families announcing the AFL-CIO will support final passage of health care reform:

“If you need any proof, just look at what the insurance companies are doing. They’re all over Capitol Hill trying to stop this bill. They know it’s a game changer for them, and that’s what we need.”

The reconciled bill the House will vote on this weekend isn’t perfect because it’s the result of a long legislative process involving a lot of give-and-take, Trumka explained. “We don’t get to decide every detail,” he said, “but we get to act, and our actions have already made this a much better bill.”

According to an AFL-CIO Blog post, in a press conference call, Trumka told reporters:

“…we are realistic enough to know it’s time for the deliberations to stop and for progress to begin. And we are idealistic enough to believe this is an opportunity to change history we can’t afford to miss.

“Rising health care costs are crushing families and businesses. Middle-class families are losing health care coverage faster than any other group today.”

“This bill is a solid first step in changing that.”

A vote in the House of Representative is expected this weekend. Call your representative at 1-877-3-AFLCIO, and tell him or her to pass the health care reform bill.

Get a report on what legislation means for your Congressional district

The House Committee on Energy and Commerce has prepared for all 435 congressional districts a report that details “the impact of the legislation on families, small businesses, seniors in Medicare, health care providers, and the uninsured.”

Click the name of your member of Congress below to get a report for your district (opens PDF file):

• G. K. Butterfield (NC-1)
• Bob Etheridge (NC-2)
• Walter B. Jones (NC-3)
• David E. Price (NC-4)
• Virginia Foxx (NC-5)
• Howard Coble (NC-6)
• Mike McIntyre (NC-7)
• Larry Kissell (NC-8)
• Sue Wilkins Myrick (NC-9)
• Patrick T. McHenry (NC-10)
• Heath Shuler (NC-11)
• Melvin L. Watt (NC-12)
• Brad Miller (NC-13)

For example, let’s take the report for Heath Shuler’s district:

There are 209,000 households that could qualify for substantial tax credits ($5,800 for a family of four making $50,000 a year) when they buy insurance under the new health insurance exchange created by this bill.

There are 14,500 individuals without insurance in Shuler’s district who have pre-existing conditions like heart disease, breast cancer, diabetes who can no longer be denied coverage because of this bill.

There are 147,000 Medicare beneficiaries in Shuler’s district who will benefit from free preventive and wellness care, improving primary and coordinated care, and enhancing nursing home care provided in this bill. 12,000 beneficiaries in his district enter the Medicare Part D ‘donut hole’ each year. A typical beneficiary who enters the donut hole will see savings of over $700 in 2011 and over $3,000 by 2020.

There are 17,200 small businesses in Shuler’s district that could qualify for tax credits of up to 50% of the costs of providing health insurance to their employees and 18,300 small businesses that will be able to enter the insurance exchange, increasing their bargaining power with insurance companies.

There are 78,000 residents in Shuler’s district who currently do not have health insurance and will receive coverage under this bill.

There are 12 community health centers in the district that provide health care to the poor and medically underserved. These centers will receive $15.6 million in new assistance because of this legislation.

Take a look at the report for where you live, then call your representative at 1-877-3-AFLCIO, and tell him or her to pass the health care reform bill.

Savings over 20 years: $1.2 trillion

The Congressional Budget Office, the non-partisan budget score keeper Democrats and Republicans alike depend on to tell them what impact bills have on the budget, released it’s report on the revised legislation to reform health care and health insurance – and it’s a huge money saver.

Comprehensive reform will cost the federal government $940 billion over 10 years, but the cost is more than made up for by increases in revenue and reduced costs. The result is a net savings of $130 billion over 10 years.

That’s worth repeating for our readers who are concerned about our nation’s rising debt: doing nothing costs more than passing this bill. If you or your member of Congress has been withholding support of this legislation for fear we cannot afford it, the CBO report should lay those fears to rest.

Cree praised as leader in green technology

Vice President Joe Biden and Energy Secretary Steven Chu were in Durham this week to promote the stimulus bill’s clean-energy tax credit and to tout the accomplishments of Cree, a manufacturer of LED lighting.

Because of a $39 million tax credit, Cree has been able to hire 375 workers in the state since 2009. Cree has also been awarded $1.8 million in stimulus funds to pay for research and development, according to a report in the Durham Herald-Sun:

Biden praised the 23-year-old company for innovating, creating domestic jobs and manufacturing capacity and exporting its products around the world. “A company like Cree is a model for what we’re trying to do,” he said.

The vice president said the company and others like it are helping green jobs bolster prospects for the middle class.

“We want to make sure that everyone who aspires to be in the middle class can get there, and that those that get there can stay there,” Biden stated.

To Turn Around America, we have to become a country that leads the world in a new technological clean-energy revolution, one that will bring good-paying jobs like Cree is doing with help from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

At the event, Vice President Biden announced that even the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which has often been at odds with this administration, had just signed a letter asking Congress to expand the credit, and Biden defended the program against critics who would call it wasteful:

“We’ll get our money back in spades. We’ll get a return on this program that far exceeds any investment we make.”

Actions planned in NC next week

On Thursday, March 25, 2010, working families will join together at Bank of America in Raleigh to demand good jobs now. America needs 11 million jobs, and big Wall Street banks should pay to rebuild jobs and the economy they helped destroy in 2008.

Since the recession began, America has lost nearly 9 million jobs. While Americans have lost jobs, homes, retirement savings, and hope, Wall Street banks took billions in taxpayer bailouts – and returned to business as usual.

<
In 2009 alone, Wall Street banks paid their executives $145 billion in pay and bonuses. Now they’re spending millions lobbying to kill financial reform.

Good Jobs Now: Make Wall Street Pay events led by the AFL-CIO are taking place across the country. Find out more at www.aflioc.org/createjobs.

In Asheville:

What: Make Wall Street Pay To Restore Jobs targeting Bank of America and Wachovia
When: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 at 12:00 noon
Where: Pritchard Park in downtown Asheville, NC

For more information about the Asheville action, contact Western NC CLC President, Mark Case 828-215-8883.

In Raleigh:

What: Informational Picket targeting Bank of America
When: Thursday, March 25, 2010 at 11:30 am
Where: Bank of America, 321 Oberlin Rd, Raleigh, NC

For more information about the Raleigh action, contact Triangle Labor Council President, Michael Gravinese at 919-833-6678.

Will yours be counted?

Every ten years, the Constitution of the United States gives every individual in America the chance to do one thing that will shape his or her life and the lives of everyone they know at every level of government for the next decade – be counted in the census.

Being counted is easy to do. Ten questions in ten minutes is all it takes to complete the 2010 Census. Fill it out, mail it back in the postage-paid envelope, and that’s it. Simple and patriotic!

Workers, Jobs, and the Census

It’s important, too! Our allies at the Southern Coalition for Social Justice have published a helpful fact-sheet (PDF), which explains the many reasons why an accurate census count is important to working families, worker empowerment, and job creation. For example:

“North Carolina received over $261 million in census-allocated federal funds in 2008 alone for job-training and related programs. The amount of funding NC receives [...] is based on the number of people counted in the most recent US Census — the more people counted by the Census, the more money NC receives [for these programs].”

The population count the 2010 Census provides will determine if our state and your community receives its fair share of federal resources and representation in the United States Congress. In fact, the results will be used to redraw electoral districts at every level of government.

A complete count also will help companies decide where to build new facilities, help governments decide where to offer new services like job training centers, and will determine state-by-state GDP per capita and poverty data – information used in everything from the provision of health care to school funding and more.

Census forms are arriving now

Check your mail box. Chances are your letter carrier has already delivered your 2010 Census form. Census day is April 1, 2010 – so be sure to fill it out and mail it back by then.

For more information about the 2010 Census, visit 2010.census.gov.

“Everybody In Nobody Out”

Health Care for America Now – North Carolina members and supporters will rally in Charlotte this Saturday and march to end health care discrimination. Folks will gather at the Greater Mt. Moriah Primitive Baptist Church and then march to Charlotte Square.

What: March and rally to support HCR passage
When: This Saturday, March 20 – 11:00 to march, 12 noon – 3:00pm for the rally
Where: March from Greater Mt. Moriah Primitive Baptist
Church, 727 West Trade St. Charlotte, NC, to the rally spot at Charlotte Square (corner of Trade and Tryon).

This event is sponsored by the Charlotte Health Care Coalition. Supporters include the NAACP, AFL-CIO and Southern Piedmont Central Labor Council, Workers United/SEIU, State Employee Association of NC (SEANC), and MoveOn.org, among others.

Download the flyer for this event. Click here to RSVP for this event.

For more information, contact Kojo Nantambu at 704-599-8904 or Carla Cunningham at 704-509-2939.

APWU is asking for our help

Senior management at the United States Postal Service is asking the Congress to sign off on its plans to eliminate six-day mail delivery service.

Click here to support six-day mail delivery.

Your brothers and sisters in the American Postal Worker Union (and in the National Association of Letter Carriers) need your help:

The APWU is asking union members to contact their U.S. Representatives and encourage them to co-sponsor House Resolution 173, which urges the Postal Service to continue to provide mail delivery six days per week.

The resolution, which was introduced by Rep. Sam Graves (R-MO), expresses the “sense of the House of Representatives that the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure the continuation of its six-day mail delivery service.” The Postal Service is asking Congress to reduce the number of mail delivery days required by law from six days per week to five.

In a message to legislative activists, Legislative and Political Director Myke Reid warns that, if accepted by Congress, five-day delivery would begin a “death spiral” for the USPS. “In addition to the thousands of jobs lost, there will undoubtedly be an erosion of confidence in the Postal Service’s ability to provide the services the public relies on.”

“Mail delivery is not only a vital part of the national economy, but also provides the timely delivery of needed goods and services to all segments of society,” the message notes.

“People currently depend on the Postal Service to provide those services, and if we don’t, they will find someone else who will,” Reid cautions.

Click here to ask your U.S. representative to support House Resolution 173.

by Michael Schwalbe

Michael Schwalbe is a professor of sociology at North Carolina State University. He recently had a piece published in the print edition of the News & Observer about the importance of recognizing labor’s contributions to our society, contributions many Americans may take for granted. We have reprinted his piece here with permission:

When teaching about social movements in America, I ask my students how many of them had to take a U.S. labor history course in high school. For the last twenty-five years the answer has been the same. Not a one.

I ask the question to make a point about how we learn what’s needed for social change to occur. If all we know about social change comes from celebrating the lives of Susan B. Anthony, Rosa Parks, or Martin Luther King Jr., we may think that change results mainly from individual moral heroism.

The study of labor history teaches a different lesson: change occurs through organized, persistent, collective action by ordinary people. It’s not surprising that those with the biggest stake in preserving the status quo don’t want that lesson taught.

But times might be changing. After twelve years of legislative efforts, the state of Wisconsin recently passed the Labor History in the Schools Bill, the first such law in the country. The new law makes labor history part of the state’s standard social studies curriculum.

The purpose of the bill is to ensure that students learn about the roles played by workers, labor unions, and collective bargaining in the history of America. Every state ought to enact a version of this law. Students everywhere need to know their labor history.

Pro-union bumper stickers remind us that unions are the people who brought us the weekend. The rest of the story would include other benefits won by organized labor: pensions, workers’ compensation, health plans, vacations, the eight-hour day, overtime pay, and many safety laws.

To take these benefits for granted is not simply a failure to appreciate how unions have helped us all. It is a failure to understand U.S. history. It is akin to taking for granted our independence from the British, with no knowledge of the Revolutionary War.

Promoting the study of labor history is not, in other words, a matter of being for or against unions. It’s a matter of being for education. The present, as the saying goes, is incomprehensible without an understanding of the past.

For example, my students at North Carolina State University are often surprised to learn that ours is the least unionized state in the nation; that North Carolina is one of only two states that outlaw public sector collective bargaining; and that economic inequality is greater today than at any time since the Great Depression. They want to know how things got this way.

A good labor history course would answer this question.

Students would learn how southern textile workers in the late 1920s and early 1930s organized to resist exploitation by mill owners, and how mill owners, in collusion with police and politicians, used violence to quash strikes.

One legacy of this violence is a fear of unions, a fear that partly accounts for the low unionization rate in North Carolina. A study of labor history would reveal that violence associated with union organizing originated not with workers but with bosses afraid of losing power and profits.

Students would also learn how North Carolina’s General Statute 95-98, which prohibits collective bargaining by public employees, grew out of 1950s anti-communist hysteria and fear that alliances between black and white workers would challenge the dominance of North Carolina’s ruling white oligarchy.

Every state has its equivalent labor history stories that need to be told. Students should learn both the local stories and how these stories connect to national labor movements and international labor struggles. “Globalization” is a trendy topic these days among professional educators. But any teaching about globalization that fails to connect local, national, and international struggles for economic justice by working people is seriously incomplete.

To understand rising inequality in the United States, students would need to look at changes in union strength. Historically, strong unions have put a brake on inequality. Dramatic increases in inequality in the last thirty years are attributable largely to the success of big business in weakening unions.

Of course, labor history is not only about unions and protest. It’s also about the history of work and changes in the economy. And so students would also learn how labor has changed because of changes in technology, corporate deregulation, and international trade policies.

Passing more laws like Wisconsin’s won’t be easy. I don’t expect it to happen any time soon in North Carolina. But nor did I expect to see tobacco-rich North Carolina ban smoking in bars and restaurants, as it did earlier this year. All it takes for this kind of thing to happen, against the odds, is a critical mass of people who have learned the lessons of labor history.

“Vote ‘YES’, fix this mess!”

Dozens of people rallied outside the Raleigh offices of Congressman Bob Etheridge (D-2nd), today, to show their support for finishing the job on health insurance / health care reform.  The rally was a last-minute response to an anti-reform protest of Rep. Etheridge, who voted for the House reform bill. Even with the short notice, reform supporters far outnumbered opponents.

Speakers at the rally included NC AFL-CIO President, James Andrews, and Adam Searing, director of the Health Access Coalition.  The NC Justice Center has pictures and links to audio and video of speakers on its Facebook page.

Can we afford NOT to act?

We are now in the end-game on health care reform. Time will tell whether it succeeds or fails, but is failure really an option for North Carolinians?

“North Carolinians need health reform more than ever,” says the national non-profit health care policy group, Families USA, in a new report, The Cost of Doing Nothing:

“The costs of health care have outpaced workers’ wages, jeopardized the survival of businesses, and led more and more people to lose their insurance coverage. As a result, the number of North Carolinians who delay or forgo medical care and die prematurely has increased at a dangerous rate. At the same time, insurance companies’ profits rose 428% between 2000 and 2007.”

The reform legislation passed by the Senate and yet-to-be reconciled with the House of Representatives would provide coverage to at least 31 million Americans and reduce the federal deficit by $132 billion by 2019.

However, if reform fails, the outlook for North Carolina is grim. According to the Families USA report, if we do nothing to reform health care:

• 1,720,000 North Carolinians will lack health insurance by 2019. If reform passes 988,000 people will gain insurance.
• The average North Carolinian’s family insurance premium will increase by $8,475 by 2019. If reform passes, subsidies for coverage will lower families’ premiums and require 85 cents of every premium dollar be spent on care, not profits.
• North Carolina’s small businesses will pay $5.2 billion more for health care premiums by 2018 [profits for insurance companies instead of small business -Ed.] If reform passes, these business will get new tax breaks and a new marketplace to buy affordable coverage.
• 247,000 Medicare beneficiaries in North Carolina will still fall into the gap in prescription drug coverage. If reform passes, fewer seniors will have to choose between food and medicine.
• Nearly 3 working-age North Carolinians [will continue to] die each day because they lack health insurance. If reform passes, these people will have access to life saving coverage.

The job can get done on health care reform by reconciling the Senate and House bills with a majority, up or down vote in the Senate. This report makes clear: doing nothing isn’t an option North Carolinians can afford. Read the full report for North Carolina (Word Doc).

Blue Cross Blue Shield NC premiums way up

The News & Observer reports on huge rate increases hitting North Carolina families who have health care coverage through Blue Cross Blue Shield – almost everyone, given their practical monopoly:

“In this state, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, a nonprofit insurer that controls most of the state’s market for individual policies, is allowed to raise those rates an average of about 12 percent this year.”

The average isn’t the whole story. Some policy holders are seeing rates go up 50% or more, according to N&O reporter, Alan Wolf:

“David Swanson, a Durham investment adviser, received new rates for his teenagers. The monthly premium for his 15-year-old son increased about 11 percent to $185.15. The rate for his 17-year-old daughter jumped 54 percent, to $255.57.”

Employers are paying much more for coverage. Most of BCBSNC’s 3.7 million customers are enrolled through work, where some have been hit by double-digit premium hikes.

Read the whole story, Rising Blue Cross bills stun N.C. families, at the N&O web site.

If the market is the solution, how’s that working out now?

Opponents of reforming any industry always say regulation isn’t the answer. Well, absent meaningful regulations, how are the health insurance companies doing at keeping costs down (and profits up)?

Adam Linker, blogger at The Progressive Pulse, the NC Policy Watch blog, has put together a list of their Top 10 Favorite Health Insurance Company Innovations. They’re spot on, all of them, but here are some ‘highlights’:

10. The “in-network” and “out-of-network” doctor. Want to choose your own doctor? Sorry, not with private insurance. To get covered you have to go to the right doctor and the right hospital. If you guess wrong and go to an unapproved hospital you could get stuck paying thousands of dollars in medical bills. To keep things exciting sometimes a hospital will be “in-network” but the doctor who treats you at the hospital will be “out-of-network”. It’s all part of the fun.

8. The for-profit nonprofit. Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies across the country are mostly nonprofit, but they act like for-profit companies. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina owns subsidiary for-profit entities and pays its CEO more than $4 million per year. But BCBSNC does not have any real oversight from shareholders or the Securities and Exchange Commission.

3. Rescission. We can all agree that people with sloppy handwriting or those who lie about acne medication don’t deserve health insurance. To help fight this scourge, insurance companies developed something called “rescission”. If you get sick then insurance companies will pore over your application to find mistakes or omissions. If you forgot to include something then you can get booted off of insurance and the insurance company can even pursue you for back payments. That’s innovation at its best!

There’s also “Charging women more than men for the same coverage” (#7), “Lifetime caps” (#4), and the end-all-be-all of health insurance industry innovations, “The pre-existing condition” (#1):

“This is the king of insurance industry innovations. Medicare will cover you even with a preexisting condition, but why would a private company that is trying to pad its bottom line want to offer coverage to someone who might get sick? Insurance companies want to collect money, not pay it out. So if you’ve ever had an illness insurance companies will refuse to offer you coverage. Or better yet, the insurance company will offer coverage for a mere $2,000 per month.”

Click here to get the full list of all these distinctly American innovations (we’re the only country that allows this stuff, folks).

Tell Betsy Atkins to resign in protest

Our fellow union members at the Farm Labor Organizing Committee (FLOC, AFL-CIO) need our support in their campaign to get Reynolds American to do right by the tobacco workers who harvest the golden leaf.

Betsy Atkins is a board member at Reynolds, but despite her encouragement, Reynolds CEO, Susan Ivey, still refuses any dialogue with FLOC about the terrible conditions under which tobacco harvesters labor.

Atkins also sits on the board of Chico’s, a woman’s clothing retailer committed to ethical sourcing. We believe Atkins commitment doesn’t end when she puts on her Reynolds hat. Her resignation would signal in concrete terms her commitment to ethical sourcing and for justice for farm workers.

“Though FLOC repeatedly asked Atkins for her help in contacting Reynolds CEO Susan Ivey, she has never responded directly to FLOC. When we began raising this issue with Chico’s corporate leaders, FLOC was told that Atkins had “continuously encouraged” Reynolds CEO Susan Ivey to communicate with FLOC. As yet Reynolds CEO Ivey has not contacted FLOC, nor has Atkins ever contacted FLOC directly about her discussions with Reynolds CEO Ivey.

“We call on Betsy Atkins to resign from the Reynolds American Inc. Board of Directors. Her resignation from the Reynolds Board would be a concrete expression of her support for Chico’s Terms of Commitment to Ethical Sourcing as well as her support for justice for farm workers. “

Click here to send a fax to Betsy Atkins asking her resign in protest. We encourage all of our readers to show solidarity with FLOC by sending a fax, today, then sharing this message with your network.

The Recovery Act is working

One year ago this week, President Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. At the time our economy was in free fall, the stock market had tanked, and job losses were topping 800,000 a month. Millions of Americans who lost their jobs were also losing their health insurance and running out of unemployment benefits. The financial collapse caused by Wall St had crippled Main St, and the task of averting another Great Depression was left to the only institution capable of responding: we the people.

In remarks on the first anniversary of signing the Recovery Act, President Obama said of its necessity, “We had a responsibility to do what was right for the U.S. economy and for the American people.”

“One year later, it is largely thanks to the Recovery Act that a second depression is no longer a possibility. It’s one of the main reasons the economy has gone from shrinking by 6 percent to growing at about 6 percent. And this morning we learned that manufacturing production posted a strong gain. So far, the Recovery Act is responsible for the jobs of about 2 million Americans who would otherwise be unemployed. These aren’t just our numbers; these are the estimates of independent, nonpartisan economists across the spectrum.”

Millions of unemployed workers have been able to keep their health care coverage because of the generous COBRA subsidies in the Recovery Act and meet basic needs because of the extension of federal unemployment benefits under the Act.

Ninety-five percent of Americans are paying lower taxes because of tax cuts included in the Recovery Act – the largest middle class tax cut, ever.

State governments across the country, while still having to deal with huge budget shortfalls, have averted disaster because of direct aid for teachers, police officers, and firefighters.

Tens of thousands of construction workers idled by the housing and commercial real estate collapse are employed building or improving our state’s infrastructure. North Carolina alone was awarded over half a billion dollars to develop high speed rail from Charlotte to Raleigh and on to Richmond – money that came from the Recovery Act.

“Just look at the outside evaluations of the stimulus,” says David Leonhardt, economics writer for the New York Times:

“Perhaps the best-known economic research firms are IHS Global Insight, Macroeconomic Advisers and Moody’s Economy.com. They all estimate that the bill has added 1.6 million to 1.8 million jobs so far and that its ultimate impact will be roughly 2.5 million jobs. The Congressional Budget Office, an independent agency, considers these estimates to be conservative.”

“We must not forget the enormity of the damage done to the economy before the Recovery Act,” says Ross Eisenbrey at the Economic Policy Institute:

“From December 2007 to March 2009, one out of every twenty private sector jobs was eliminated, a rate of destruction 50% greater than even the severe recession in the early 1980s. With unemployment at 9.7% today, it’s hard to appreciate how much more damage the stimulus investments prevented. Without the more than two million jobs generated by the Recovery Act, the unemployment rate would now exceed 11% rather than the 9.7% rate in January.”

There’s more that must be done to create the number of jobs needed to climb out of the hole we’re in. That’s why the AFL-CIO is pushing for much greater investment in job creation. Check out the federation’s five-point plan to put America back to work here.

Sign the petition to give TSOs a Voice @ Work

Nine years is long enough for workers at the Transportation Security Administration to go without collective bargaining rights. Janet Napolitano, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has the power to grant this basic human right to Transportation Security Officers. The federal employees union, AFGE, is asking for our help to convince her to act:

“As all of you know, AFGE has been in a 9 year fight to obtain collective bargaining for the nation’s Transportation Security Officers (TSOs) at our airports. The fight continues and has intensified after the nominee for the TSA Administrator, Erol Southers, withdrew his nomination.

“AFGE has created an online petition addressed to DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano asking her to grant collective bargaining for the TSOs now and we’re asking the AFL-CIO State Feds, CLC’s, CLF’s and ALF’s if they will post it on their websites and ask union members throughout the country to “sign” the petition in solidarity with their brothers and sisters, 13,000 TSOs who have joined AFGE thus far, who are asking for a Voice at Work.

“The time for change is long overdue. It is time for TSOs to have full workplace rights, including the
right to bargain collectively. This is the most effective path to building the professional workforce
that our country demands and deserves. We urge [DHS Secretary Napolitano] to immediately grant collective bargaining
rights to Transportation Security Officers.”

Sign the petition to DHS Secretary Napolitano to grant TSOs Collective Bargaining Rights!

Labor Dept. announces new rules for H-2A

U.S. Secretary of Labor, Hilda Solis announced tough new regulations on wages and job safety protections for temporary agricultural workers. The new rules, which will go into effect in time for the 2010 growing season, “reflect the Administration’s commitment to providing fair wages and strong labor protections for this vulnerable group of workers,” said Secretary Solis:

“This new rule will make it possible for all workers who are working hard on American soil to receive fair pay while at the same time expand opportunities for U.S. workers. The actions that we have taken through this rulemaking also will enable us to detect and remedy different forms of worker violations.”

The H-2A guest worker program allows farm owners to hire foreign workers to fill jobs owners say most Americans do not want. In reality, many farm owners have used the program as a steady source of cheap, easily exploitable labor while doing little to promote job openings to American workers.

Melinda Wiggins, Executive Director at the Durham-based non-profit, Student Action with Farmworkers, said the new regulations will lead to positive change in how these workers are treated:

“While there are still a number of improvements needed in the H2A program, the new wage rate formula, travel reimbursement requirements, and pre-occupancy inspection of housing are steps in the right direction.

“These changes bode well for the future of agricultural workers in our country. We look forward to more changes from the US Department of Labor that will improve the labor conditions of one of the worst paid and least protected group of workers in our country.”

What the new rules will mean for farm workers

Major features of the final rule issued by D.O.L. include a requirement that employers provide documentation to the Department proving that they are in compliance with the law. Prior to the new rule, employers only had to say so.

The new rule will increase wages for farm workers on average by over a dollar an hour. Additionally, the Wage and Hour Division has been given independent authority to levy civil money penalties against and even disbar farm employers from the H-2A program for violations, including housing violations.

The new rule also reinstates the requirement that State Workforce Agencies inspect and approve employer-provided housing before the Department issues an H-2A permit. Also, the SWA will once again be able to assist employers in ways that will expand job opportunities for U.S. workers.

The Department will create a national electronic registry of jobs for all H-2A job orders “to improve U.S. worker access to agricultural jobs and help growers find workers from across the U.S.”

Significantly, the new rule closes a major loophole that had allowed farm employers to discourage U.S. workers from taking jobs by paying them lower wages and benefits than foreign workers. The protections of the H-2A program are now extended to all workers in “corresponding employment” – including any work on the job order.

H-2A labor contractors will now be forbidden from hiring workers and moving them from site to site under the same certification. These contractors will face the same regulations as fixed-site farm employers.

Employers will now be required to provide workers with copies of the job orders no later than before departure – including from their home countries, and they’ll be required to display a poster describing employee rights and protections at the work site in English or whatever other language workers understand.

Employers will no longer be able to use the H-2A program to replace workers who are on strike or locked out. The rule change issued by the Obama Department of Labor prohibits approval for H-2A certification at any of these work sites.

Righting wrongs of previous administration

The action taken this week by Secretary Solis is in many ways a reversal of last-minute rule changes forced through by Bush Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao.

“The new regulations in large part reinstate the regulations which had worked fairly well since 1987, when they were adopted after the changes in the H-2 program in the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986,” says MaryLee Hall, Managing Attorney at Legal Aid of North Carolina’s Farmworker Unit:

“These 1987 regulations, in effect for more than 20 years, were gutted by the midnight H-2A regulations promulgated by Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao, which became effective on January 17, 2009, 3 days before President Obama took office.

“The new regulations promulgated by Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis this week reinstate the effective preference for U.S. workers [...] as well as the protections for both U.S. and H-2A workers. In addition, the new regulations include some of the improved enforcement measures in the Chao regulations as well as some sensible, streamlined processing and enforcement provisions.

“Although not perfect, they are a vast improvement over the Chao regulations under which H-2A wages fell by more than $2 per hour to the federal minimum wage for most workers on farms employing H-2A workers in North Carolina.”

“This is a victory for our nation’s farmworkers,” said Bruce Goldstein, Executive Director of Farmworker Justice, a national farmworker advocacy group based in Washington DC:

“It’s a reversal of radical anti-worker policies imposed by the previous administration that irresponsibly stripped away basic procedures and worker protections set in place by a Republican administration in 1987.”

You can read a fact sheet on the new rules for the H-2A temporary agricultural worker program here.

One year into his presidency, still much more to do

On Wednesday, President Obama delivered his first State of the Union address. In his speech, the President recommitted his administration to economic recovery and job creation, announced bold new education initiatives, chided the Senate for being too slow to enact a series of reform bills passed by the House, and set the record straight about the work that’s been done so far:

…[W]e extended or increased unemployment benefits for more than 18 million Americans; made health insurance 65 percent cheaper for families who get their coverage through COBRA; and passed 25 different tax cuts.

Now, let me repeat: We cut taxes. We cut taxes for 95 percent of working families. We cut taxes for small businesses. We cut taxes for first-time homebuyers. We cut taxes for parents trying to care for their children. We cut taxes for 8 million Americans paying for college.

As a result, millions of Americans had more to spend on gas and food and other necessities, all of which helped businesses keep more workers. And we haven’t raised income taxes by a single dime on a single person. Not a single dime.

Obama called on the Senate to quickly approve a new jobs bill and proposed shifting $30 billion of TARP money away from mega-banks to community banks for lending to small businesses. He reiterated his plan to levy a fee on the biggest banks to recoup the bailout money tax payers gave them:

“I know Wall Street isn’t keen on this idea, but if these firms can afford to hand out big bonuses again, they can afford a modest fee to pay back the tax payers who rescued them in their time of need.”

The President also tried to reassure an electorate still looking for change:

“I campaigned on the promise of change — change we can believe in, the slogan went. And right now, I know there are many Americans who aren’t sure if they still believe we can change — or that I can deliver it.

“But remember this — I never suggested that change would be easy, or that I could do it alone. Democracy in a nation of 300 million people can be noisy and messy and complicated. And when you try to do big things and make big changes, it stirs passions and controversy. That’s just how it is.”

Obama urged the Congress not to abandon the American people on health care reform when victory is so close, and he called on Democrats to stiffen their spines and Republicans to do more than say “No”.

“To Democrats, I would remind you that we still have the largest majority in decades, and the people expect us to solve some problems, not run for the hills. And if the Republican leadership is going to insist that 60 votes in the Senate are required to do any business at all in this town — a supermajority — then the responsibility to govern is now yours as well. Just saying no to everything may be good short-term politics, but it’s not leadership.”

If you watched the speech on television or online, it was easy to see which members of Congress were willing to stand up and cheer for middle class tax cuts, taxing the banks, finishing the job on health care, and investing in a new, green economy and jobs.

Trumka responds to the State of the Union

Check out Pres. Trumka’s video response online.

“Pres. Obama was exactly right when he spoke tonight of the stubborn resilience of the American people in the face of adversity. Despite daily insecurity and the deep hurt of not being able to find jobs, working people’s goodness, decency and hard work have kept our country going.

“But Americans are also deeply frustrated and angry. We want to see elected leaders who’ll fight for us and bring real change. We want jobs — Pres. Obama is absolutely right that jobs must be our number one focus in 2010. And we must act on a scale that will be meaningful: We need more than 10 million jobs just to get out of the hole we’re in. We want health care fixed. We want our leaders to break the stranglehold of Wall Street and the big banks and make them pay to repair the economic damage they created.”

‘Citizens United’ ruling a disaster for democracy

If we thought the flow of money in politics was bad before, we ain’t seen nothing yet.

Last week, in a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court of the United States elevated corporations to the level of actual persons with a free-speech guarantee under the first amendment to advocate for the election or defeat of candidates. This was the work of activist conservative judges, ignoring precedent and invalidating over a century of established campaign finance law dating back to the trust-busting days of Teddy Roosevelt.

The ruling frees companies like health insurance reform villain Blue Cross Blue Shield of NC, Big Oil companies like Exxon Mobil, and major Wall Street banks like Goldman Sachs to spend whatever it takes to make sure candidates friendly to their interests win at the ballot box.

Even more dangerous than mega-companies being able to right a blank check to buy an election, the ruling leaves the door open to foreign controlled corporations and foreign sovereign wealth to pour into the United States.

The ruling on constitutional grounds invalidates state and local laws, too – like those on the books in North Carolina which prohibited corporations from this type of electioneering.

Ostensibly, the ruling applies to unions and other non-profits because we are also corporations, albeit of a different kind than for-profit multinationals with literally billions of dollars to spend to protect their interests. In reality, there’s no comparison to the economic power (now turned political power) of these companies.

Here’s the AFL-CIO’s statement on the Citizens United ruling:

By allowing unlimited corporate treasury expenditures that explicitly support or oppose particular candidates, the Court has increased the already excessive influence corporations exert in our electoral system. And we believe the Court wrongly treated corporate expenditures the same as union expenditures, contrary to the arguments we made in our brief in this case. Unions, unlike business, are democratically-controlled, non-profit member organizations representing working men and women across the country, and their independent speech should accordingly be given greater protection.

The AFL-CIO supports a system of campaign finance regulation that promotes democratic participation in elections by individuals and their associations; protects legitimate independent speech rights; offers public financing to candidates while firmly regulating contributions to them; and guarantees effective disclosure of who is paying for what.

Of course, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is also a non-profit member organization – one to which it’s member corporations are now free to give whatever amount of money they see fit to push a pro-corporate, free trade, anti-worker, and anti-environment agenda at the ballot box.

Fix the problems of working Americans, or else

Working families, especially voters in union households, turned out big in 2008 to elect the largest Democratic majorities in Congress in decades and bring change to the White House.

In 2009, we mobilized like never before on a legislative agenda for labor law reform so workers can be empowered to form unions and bargain for a better life; for comprehensive health care reform to end insurance company abuses and secure quality, affordable coverage for every American; for investments to build a new, energy efficient, green economy that will create millions of good-paying jobs in this country.

We didn’t expect to turn around America in a single year, but we did expect to see some results by now. For the millions of workers who are unemployed a year and a half after greed on Wall St created the financial crisis and wrecked our economy, business and politics as usual is unacceptable.

The result of the Senate election in Massachusetts is evidence of a working class revolt. It revealed the danger to Democrats of not successfully addressing workers’ economic concerns.

Election night polling conducted for the AFL-CIO revealed a shocking 41-point swing among non-college educated voters from supporting Obama and the Democrats in 2008 to voting against the Democratic candidate to replace Ted Kennedy in 2010.

Voters are focused on jobs and getting results

Voters in 2010 have the same goal as voters in 2008 – fix the economy and provide affordable health care. The problem is they don’t see the job getting done.  Among the majority of voters who said the Massachusetts economy was not good or poor, 56% voted for the opposition candidate, Scott Brown. Among all voters, 79% said they want their Senator to fix the economy and create jobs. A majority, 54% said they want him to finish the job on health care.

By contrast, only 42% of voters in Massachusetts said they were sending a message to Obama and Democrats about going too far. In fact, 47% of voters said their biggest concern about Democrats is that they’re not getting the job done, compared to just 32% who said they’re doing too much too fast. Even Brown voters by 50% to 43% said they’re more concerned about a lack of change than too much.

Not a rejection of national health care reform

Brown actually lost among the 59% of voters who said health care is why they voted.  Two-thirds (67%) said they approved of Massachusetts universal health insurance law, including most Brown voters (53%).  However, voters did say they’re worried the Senate bill would tax their benefits, and 48% said it made them more likely to vote for the Republican – a warning to Democrats in the Senate that the tax on high-cost plans is political poison.

Not a referendum on Obama or endorsement of the GOP

By 61% to 33%, voters said they were choosing the best candidate, not “sending a message to Washington” – including a majority (52%) of Brown supporters.  Voters liked Scott Brown better than Martha Coakley, even as 52% said they approve of the job Obama’s doing.

Furthermore, MA voters said they trust Obama (52%) more than the GOP in Congress (33%) to fix the economy.  Three quarters (76%) of all voters said they want Brown to work with Democrats, not work to defeat them (21%), and Massachusetts voters strongly disapprove (58%) of the job being done by Republicans in Congress.

Democrats: Ignore the working class at your peril

The most telling figure from the Massachusetts election may be this: the Republican candidate, Scott Brown, got 50,000 more votes than John McCain, but the Democratic candidate received 850,000 fewer votes than Obama. A huge number of Democrats sat out this election.

This enthusiasm gap is the single biggest threat to Democratic majorities in the Congress. Unless the party in power gets serious about jobs and the economy, “they’re going to join the growing numbers of jobless Americans,” says Richard Trumka, President of the AFL-CIO:

Members of Congress from both parties need to heed the wake-up call from Massachusetts and start taxing Wall Street wealth to create millions of good jobs fast. To get elected in 2010, they’re going to have to PROVE they’ll create the jobs we need in an economy we need with the health care we need—and those who made the mess should pay the bill. Voters have heard too much talk already.

In this month’s Business NC magazine, our General Counsel, Mike Okun, was once again selected as one of the state’s “Legal Elite,” a recognition received by only about 3% of the state’s lawyers.

Also, at a dinner in Washington last November, Mike was inducted as a Fellow in the national College of Labor and Employment Lawyers. Mike is only the second North Carolina lawyer to be inducted into the College and the only lawyer representing unions and individuals. Inducted at the same time was David Prouty, formerly the General Counsel of UNITE! and now senior labor counsel to the Major League Baseball Players Association, and who many of you know from his work on many campaigns in North Carolina.

Last year Mike was also selected to be in The Best Lawyers in America and in NC Superlawyers, published by Law and Politics Magazine.

UPDATE: Postponed until 2/27 due to wintry weather

Look for more information next week.

Because the change we need must come in North Carolina

The NC State AFL-CIO is proud to stand with our partners in the HK on J alliance. Our 14-point People’s Agenda speaks to the change we need in our state capital and across North Carolina, including collective bargaining rights for public employees, high quality and diverse public schools, health care for all, and ending unjust war abroad to focus on injustice at home.

On the day before Valentines day, thousands of us will meet in Raleigh at Shaw University, where the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) was founded 50 years ago to change the world.

What: Historic Thousands on Jones St (HK on J)
When: Saturday, February 13, 2010
Where: Downtown Raleigh, NC

For more information and to share news of this event with your network, you can download the official flyer (PDF), front and back.

Nationwide phone blitz of Congress is underway

Light up those phone banks, rev up those calls, and let’s let the U.S. Congress hear the powerful voice of working families! The AFL-CIO’s national phone blitz on health care reform began at midnight and continues all day, today. The blitz comes at the most critical moment in our campaign to win real reform that works for working families.

Dial 1-877-3-AFL-CIO (1-877-323-5246)

We need a total throw-down. Everyone – all of us – national, local union leaders, activists and members, state federation, central labor and building trades council leaders.

Our message is clear. We need you to stand strong for working families by voting for health care reform that:

• DOES NOT TAX OUR BENEFITS
• Requires employers to pay their fair share
• Includes a public health care option

Now, more than ever, as federal leaders determine what the new American health care delivery system will look like for decades to come workers must be heard. See the attached flyer and spread the word. The time for congressional leaders to hear from us is now!

For more information about our national call-in day for real health care reform, contact Katie Gjertson 202-637-5166 kgjertso@aflcio.org or Scott Reynolds, 202-637-5226 sreynold@aflcio.org.

AFL-CIO President talks jobs, restoring the middle class, and health care

In a speech delivered to the National Press Club on Monday, National AFL-CIO President, Rich Trumka, said because of the failed policies of the past three decades, the United States is “a nation with profound, unaddressed structural economic problems on a long-term, downward slide.”

These structural problems made the economic collapse possible, Trumka said. “We built a low-wage, high consumption economy and tried to bridge the contradiction with debt. And there’s a lot of truth in that simplicity.”

Trumka laid blame for these structural problems on the decisions of policymakers a generation ago who “embarked on a campaign of radical deregulation and corporate empowerment – one that celebrated private greed over public service.”

Those choices undermined the middle class by under investing in the foundations of our economy – transportation and communications infrastructure, education and training – and by failing to create enough good jobs to maintain the middle class while allowing “corporate hacks” to undermine workers’ bargaining power and the quality of remaining jobs. No good jobs means no sustainable demand to drive our economy.

“We must pass the Employee Free Choice Act so that workers can have the chance to turn bad jobs into good jobs, and so we can reduce the inequality which is undermining our prospects for stable economic growth. And we must do it now–not next year, not even this summer. Now.”

Turning around America will require a “crucial alliance” between the middle class and the poor. “But today, as I speak to you, something different is happening with health care,” said Trumka.

“On the one hand we have the House bill, which asks the small part of our country that has prospered in the last decade–the richest of the rich–to pay a little bit more in taxes so that most Americans can have health insurance. And the House bill reins in the power of health insurers and employers by having an employer mandate and a strong public option.

“But thanks to the Senate rules, the appalling irresponsibility of the Senate Republicans and the power of the wealthy among some Democrats, the Senate bill instead drives a wedge between the middle class and the poor. The bill rightly seeks to ensure that most Americans have health insurance. But instead of taxing the rich, the Senate bill taxes the middle class by taxing workers’ health plans–not just union members’ health care; most of the 31 million insured employees who would be hit by the excise tax are not union members.

“The tax on benefits in the Senate bill pits working Americans who need health care for their families against working Americans struggling to keep health care for their families. This is a policy designed to benefit elites–in this case, insurers, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies and irresponsible employers, at the expense of the broader public. It’s the same tragic pattern that got us where we are today, and I can assure you the labor movement is fighting with everything we’ve got to win health care reform that is worthy of the support of working men and women.”

A warning for Democrats

Trumka said they are inviting nothing but disaster if Democrats “think they can push a few crumbs our way and then continue the failed economic policies of the last 30 years.”

“Let me be even blunter. In 1992, workers voted for Democrats who promised action on jobs, who talked about reining in corporate greed and who promised health care reform. Instead, we got NAFTA, an emboldened Wall Street — and not much more. We swallowed our disappointment and worked to preserve a Democratic majority in 1994 because we knew what the alternative was. But there was no way to persuade enough working Americans to go to the polls when they couldn’t tell the difference between the two parties. Politicians who think that working people have it too good — too much health care, too much Social Security and Medicare, too much power on the job — are inviting a repeat of 1994.

“Our country cannot afford such a repeat.”

Read the full text of President Trumka’s prepared remarks to the National Press Club. Watch video of the event at the Press Club’s web site.

A short-term ’solution’ becomes long-term debt trap

Payday lenders want policy makers and the public to believe they offer a product consumers need, but payday loans get you no where fast. Paying off a payday loan isn’t easy, and keeping you coming back for more is how payday lenders make their money.

Bad politics, worse policy

The Senate health care “reform” bill raises revenue by taxing your employer-provided health insurance benefit. This excise tax will hit middle class families hard – particularly union households because our members are more likely to have health insurance through work.

Taxing health care benefits is bad politics, and it’s the wrong way to pay for health care reform.

1 in 5 workers will be hurt by health care benefits tax

The Congressional Budget Office estimates 19% of workers will be affected in 2016 by the Senate’s proposed tax on employer-provided health care benefits. The CBO figure is backed up by Mercer, the international benefits consulting firm, which found one fifth of workers will be hit by this tax as early as 2013.

The tax will get worse every year. The Senate bill uses an arbitrary dollar amount to decide which plans get taxed, but as premiums continue to skyrocket, more and more working families will get ensnared by this tax.

Hitting the tax threshold has little to do with generosity of benefits

Health insurance costs more to buy in some states than it does in others. Premiums are higher for businesses in certain industries than in others. The tax would affect many plans that have relatively high costs for reasons that have nothing to do with the generosity of benefits.

Actually, only 6% of the variation in plan costs can be explained by benefit design plus plan type (HMO, PPO, POS or high-deductible), according to a recent study published by the prestigious journal Health Affairs.

Employers will cut benefits to avoid the health care benefits tax

The Senate’s benefits tax will mean higher insurance premiums because private insurers will raise rates to offset their higher tax liability. Most everyone who has health insurance through work can expect employers to avoid the tax by increasing cost sharing and offering junk insurance plans.

According to a Mercer survey of 465 health plan sponsors, 63 percent say they would cut covered benefits to avoid paying the excise tax, 23 percent would maintain their current plan and pass along the tax to their employees and only 2 percent would absorb the new tax themselves.

Tax violates pledge that workers can keep the plans they have

A central tenet of reform is that Americans who currently have coverage can keep the plan they have. The benefits tax will create incentives for employers to drop or severely curtail health insurance coverage – incentives employers are not likely to ignore – while making coverage through work more costly than ever. Keeping the plan you have through work may be harder than ever, if not impossible.

Benefits tax will not lower health care costs

A recent report by the Commonwealth Fund found that “there is little empirical evidence that such a tax would have a substantial effect on health care spending.”

The key to reining in health care spending is to get providers to deliver care in more cost-effective ways. Increasing out-of-pocket costs for workers may actually lead consumers to forgo necessary care and make counterproductive health care decisions.

There were real cost control options — like a publicly owned and operated insurance company to keep private insurers honest or drug re-importation from Canada where the same drugs are made in the same plants but sold for far less — yet the Senate bill abandoned those measures. A tax on your health benefits is no substitute.

Benefits tax will not increase wages

Advocates of the benefits tax – including the White House – argue that workers will enjoy higher wages if health care costs are brought under control. They point to wage growth in the late 1990s, a period when health care costs rose more slowly than the explosive growth today, as proof.

However, the Economic Policy Institute has released a paper finding the logic behind this argument in favor of the tax is only skin deep:

The recent claims that trends in employer health care expenditures explain the beneficial wage growth of the late 1990s and the disappointing wage growth since 2000 does not hold up to any careful scrutiny. Health care expenditures are relatively small compared to overall wages, and an examination of the actual trends shows that health care cost increases do not correspond to the major movements in wages or compensation. This is especially the case for the wage trends of low- and middle-wage workers: their wages accelerated the most in the late 1990s and grew the least in the 2000s. The fact that these groups have the least participation in employer-provided health plans confirms that health care is not the major factor that the advocates of this new health care theory of wage determination would have us believe. There undoubtedly is a tradeoff between health care costs and wage growth, but this dynamic does not play a leading role in the drama of the stagnant wages facing workers for several decades and the inability of working families to benefit from rising productivity growth.

Furthermore, the Mercer survey of employers who provide health insurance through work found that “less than a fifth of respondents (16 percent) say they would convert their cost savings into higher pay.”

There is a better way to fund reform, and it’s in the House bill

The House bill gets it right. Instead of taxing benefits, it would raise revenue for health care reform by levying an surtax tax on the very richest income earners. Only individuals making more than $500,000 a year or families making more than $1,000,000 would pay – and then only on the difference between those thresholds and their actual income. Under the House bill, 97% of Americans would see not one dime in extra taxes because of health care reform.

The Senate’s benefits tax would shift costs onto the backs of workers, it is unnecessary, it would be politically disastrous, and there is very little evidence that it would have a substantial effect on national health care spending.

For more information and sources used for this article, download the AFL-CIO’s FACT SHEET: A Tax on Working Family Benefits (PDF).

We need reform that works for working families

As we reach the finish line in our fight for national health care reform, we are calling on union members nation-wide to deluge members of Congress with phone calls demanding reform that works for working families.

All of us — national, local union leaders, activists and members, state federation, central labor and building trades council leaders — need to do our part. Click here to let us know you’re signing up.

What: A national phone blitz by union members nation-wide and our coalition partners calling on the U.S. Congress demanding reform that really works for working families.
When: All shifts (24 hours) on Wednesday, January 13, 2010.
How: Call toll-free 1-877-3-AFLCIO (1-877-323-5246) to deliver this message:

“We need you to stand strong for working families by voting for health care reform that:

• DOES NOT TAX OUR BENEFITS
• Requires employers to pay their fair share
• Includes a public health care option

For a flyer, fact sheets, and other materials, visit http://www.workingfamiliestoolkit.com/. For more information about our national call-in day for real health care reform, contact Katie Gjertson 202-637-5166 kgjertso@aflcio.org or Scott Reynolds, 202-637-5226 sreynold@aflcio.org.

AFL-CIO unveils 5-point plan to fix jobs crisis

It’s up to us, America’s unions, to lead the fight for solutions that will get us out of this crisis. The AFL-CIO has a five-point plan to create and save millions of jobs over the next year, starting as soon as Congress acts. It will take all of us in the NC labor movement and in unions around the country to win this fight for Good Jobs NOW. Every day we wait, the jobs crisis gets worse.

Tell Congress: America needs jobs now. It’s time to put America back to work. Click here to send a message to your Representative and U.S. Senators. A copy of your message will also be sent to President Obama.

How did we get in this mess? The short answer is we make it, they take it.

Workers make the goods and provide the services. We work longer hours, are more productive, and corporate America takes it all – our wages, our health care, our retirement security, and even our homes.

The Wall Street agenda has run our economy for more than 30 years, with deindustrialization, deregulation, free trade and shrinking government. It destroyed the relationship between productivity and wages. That led to giant economic and social imbalances. The richest got filthy rich; the rest of us got held down. The last time wealth in America was this concentrated at the top we had the Great Depression.

The Obama Administration inherited this crisis, but it’s their responsibility now. The government’s economic recovery act provided enough spending to save or create about a million jobs and pull us back from the brink of total collapse. But it’s not enough. The problem with the stimulus wasn’t how large it was; it’s that it didn’t go far enough.

That’s what the AFL-CIO five point plan is all about:

1. Take care of families hard hit by the downturn. Unemployment insurance benefits, COBRA health insurance assistance and food aid keep money in people’s pockets. Congress must extend these programs for at least another year.
2. Rebuild America with infrastructure improvements. We can put people to work now and strengthen the economy for the future by fixing crumbling schools, roads and bridges, developing 21st century energy and communications systems and investing in green jobs and green technology.
3. Help state and local governments with their pressing needs. State and local governments and school districts are facing huge budget deficits. If Washington does not act fast, this will lead to mass layoffs of vital public-sector workers, including police, teachers and firefighters. This would mean more devastating cuts in key public services.
4. Put people to work doing work that needs to be done. The private sector is not creating jobs, and America can’t wait. It’s time for the government to step in. Let’s create the jobs in our communities from cleaning up abandoned property to helping seniors get to the grocery store. These must be good, new jobs with good pay and benefits, not jobs to replace existing public-sector workers.
5. Put TARP money to work for Main Street, not just Wall Street. When small businesses can get credit, they create jobs. The bank bailout was supposed to get credit flowing again, but small businesses are still waiting. We should hire local banks to lend leftover bailout money to small and medium-sized business for job creation.

Achieving the goals of our five point plan won’t be easy. It will be a big fight, but it’s a fight we must win. Here’s what we’ll have to do:

1. Call Sen. Richard Burr and Sen. Kay Hagan and tell them to support the Jobs for Main Street Act (H.R. 2847), which invests $154 billion to create and save jobs. This bill invests in highway and mass transit projects; building and repairing schools and low-income housing; creating and saving jobs for teachers, police and firefighters; and providing funds for additional hiring and training programs. We’re talking about 250,000 education jobs, 5,000 police officers and training for 675,000 more people. The bill also extends recovery act initiatives to help small businesses create jobs, lifeline unemployment, health care and food aid for people who have lost their jobs and cuts taxes for 16 million families through the Child Tax Credit. And it’s totally paid for with leftover bank bailout funds.
2. Get ready for a big fight. Get your local rapid response team and your volunteer mobilization crew ready. Get your phone banks and mail and e-mail lists ready.
3. Plan to take the fight to the state level. Once Congress passes funding, we’ll have to work hard to make sure our state government makes the smart decisions on where and how to invest and acts fast to solve the jobs crisis.

Spread the word in the state and local press

Over the holidays, our officers were able to get three opinion pieces about the need for good jobs now published: in the Durham Herald-Sun, the Greensboro News & Record, and the Asheville Citizen-Times. Keep us posted if you or someone you know gets a letter published about the need for good jobs now.

Remember the union when it seems like it’s you against the world. The union reminds us that we are not alone, and we are not powerless when we work together. It’s up to us, union people, to do something and not stand by and watch as more people lose their jobs, their health care, their homes and their hope.

Celebrate the life and times of the real ‘Norma Rae’ and U-N-I-O-N

This Saturday, January 9, 2010, folks will come together in Greensboro, NC to celebrate the life of Crystal Lee Sutton, the real “Norma Rae”. John Wilhelm, President of UNITE HERE, will be the keynote speaker.

The celebration will include testimonials, videos, cultural presentations and comments by family, friends and union activists.

What: Tribute to Crystal Lee Sutton
When: Saturday, January 9, 2010 from 3:00 to 5:00 pm
Where: Glenwood Community Center, 2010 Coliseum Blvd., Greensboro, NC

Download the flyer for this event here.

Not worthy of our support without changes

Working people have been fighting for health care reform in the United States for over a century. Despite the challenges to getting a good bill, we are not about to give up now.

Today, our country stands alone in the developed world as the only nation not to provide comprehensive health care to all her people. It is a distinction without honor or even common sense.

Sadly, in the U.S. Senate, there are enough defenders of the health care industrial complex to undermine, delay, or – they hope – defeat the best chance at reform we have ever had. They are defenders of a status quo which kills 45,000 people each year for lack of health care coverage and caused 62 percent of all bankruptcies in 2007 alone.

The House has passed its version of health care reform, HR 3962. While the Senate bill contains some important provisions in the House bill, there are significant deficiencies. We would like to see the Senate produce a bill we can rally behind, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said in a statement released today:

“But for this health care bill to be worthy of the support of working men and women, substantial changes must be made. The AFL-CIO intends to fight on behalf of all working families to make those changes and win health care reform that is deserving of the name.

“The absolute refusal of Republicans in the Senate to support health care reform and the hijacking of the bill by defenders of the insurance industry have brought us a Senate bill that is inadequate: It is too kind to the insurance industry.”

The Senate’s health care benefits tax on the middle class

Whereas the House bill would raise revenue with a tiny surtax on millionaires, the Senate would have middle class families pay a tax on their current health benefits. If you’re lucky enough to have health insurance through work, the Senate bill would tax you on it as if it was income.

Not only is this a tax increase on persons making less than $250,000 a year – something candidate Obama promised us he would not allow as president – it will encourage many employers to stop offering health insurance all together rather than pay increased payroll taxes.

To add insult to injury, unions have for years now had to sacrifice wage increases in contract negotiations just to keep health insurance coverage at rates workers can afford. Now the Senate would tax us on those benefits.

It doesn’t have to be this way – the House bill, HR 3962, does not contain a health care benefits tax. Not only is it bad policy for the Senate to increase taxes on middle class families, it is terrible politics.

The Senate’s individual mandate is a bailout for private insurance companies

The Senate bill will require every American to buy health insurance from a private health insurance monopoly. Absent the public option, the individual mandate to buy coverage will force you to become a customer of Blue Cross Blue Shield or one of the few other private health insurance providers – companies which enjoy an exemption from federal anti-trust laws.

The Senate bill would provide 30 million new customers for private insurance companies while doing nothing to constrain costs and leaving private health insurance companies unchecked. The subsidies to help people afford to buy coverage, while necessary for low income individuals and families, will be in effect a massive transfer of wealth to private insurance companies.

Genuine reform requires something different

Genuine health care reform must bring down health costs, hold insurance companies accountable, assure that Americans can get the health care they need and be financed fairly.

• That’s why we are championing a public health insurance option: It is the only way to break the stranglehold of the insurance industry over consumers that has led to double digit premium increases virtually every year.
• Employers must pay their fair share.
• And the benefits of hard-working Americans cannot be taxed to pay for health care reform — that’s no way to rein in insurance companies and it’s the wrong way to pay for health care reform.

The Senate bill does some good things: minimum benefit standards, help for low income individuals and families, an end to the denial of care based on pre-existing conditions, and help for seniors receiving prescription drug coverage, says Trumka.

“But because it bends toward the insurance industry, the Senate bill will not check costs in the short term, and its financing asks working people and the country to pay the price, even as benefits are cut.

“The House bill is the model for genuine health care reform. Working people cannot accept anything less than real reform.”

Retirees urge Congressman to support HCR

What present would you ask your member of Congress for this holiday season? How about living up to the campaign promises made to voters in 2008?

An organization of union retirees in North Carolina, the Alliance for Retired Americans (ARA), has something in mind — comprehensive health care reform.

“Give the gift of health care reform. Please help us have a happier and healthier year in 2010″ was the message on the card delivered to Rep. Heath Shuler (D-11) by John Newman and Jack Marion, state ARA president and Western NC staff person, respectively, at their meeting with the Congressman on December 7.

Last month, Rep. Shuler was won of several Democrats to vote against passage of the House health care and insurance reform bill, HR 3962, despite having won election in 2006 and reelection last year in large part because of strong, well organized support from union members and union retirees in the 11th Congressional District.

The retirees are hoping Rep. Shuler will change his tune when the time comes for the House to vote on final passage, hopefully soon. ‘Tis the season for gift giving, after all.

Let’s get it done – and done right!

The campaign to pass reform of the health insurance industry and the provision of health care in our country has come further this year than ever before.

Still, that’s not good enough.

Until the Congress passes and the President signs comprehensive health care reform legislation, our job is not done. Historic votes alone in one chamber or the other will mean nothing to the 45,000 Americans who die each year because they don’t have health insurance.

Join us next week at a press conference for health care reform

What: Health Care Reform press conference
When: Tuesday, December 8, 2009 from 11:00 to 11:30 am
Where: North Carolina Association of Educators, 700 South Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC

This presser is sponsored by the NC Health Access Coalition, NC AFL-CIO, and NC NAACP. Speakers will include uninsured and underinsured community members, a health care provider, a small business owner, and Reverend Dr. William Barber of the NAACP.

For more information, contact Hope Marasco with the Health Access Coalition at (919) 619-0796 / hope@ncjustice.org or MaryBe McMillan with the AFL-CIO at (919) 833-6678 / marybe@aflcionc.org.

Brought to you by NC APRI

The North Carolina APRI has arranged for a health fair at their 4th quarter executive board meeting on Saturday, December 19, 2009.

There will be free blood pressure checks, glucose monitoring, and questions answered on many other general health issues. This is part of the NC APRI’s mission to eliminate health care disparities, and it is open to APRI members and non-members alike.

What: Community health screening
When: Saturday, December 19, 2009 at 12:00 noon
Where: House of Labor, 1408 Hillsborough St, Raleigh, NC
RSVP: Call 919-833-6671 or email ncapri@earthlink.net

For more information, contact Melvin Montford, President, NC APRI at 919-608-5483.

Save the Dates: January 14-18, 2010

Every year the national AFL-CIO observes the Martin Luther King, Jr. holiday with a conference. This year it was in Memphis, TN, the location of the 1968 sanitation workers’ strike at which King rallied for union rights and where he was later assassinated.

Next year labor leaders, rank-and-file members, community organizations, civil rights groups, and our allies will converge on Greensboro, NC, where the sit-in movement began at February 1, 1960 at the Woolworth’s downtown – now the International Civil Rights Museum.

What: 2010 AFL-CIO Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday Observance
When: January 14-18, 2010
Where: Sheraton Greensboro at Four Seasons, 3121 High Point Rd, Greensboro, NC

The conference will include plenary sessions, workshops, awards dinner, labor breakfast, an ecumenical service, a parade, community service projects, and much more.

Download the flyer and the registration form for this event for information about the hotel, registration fees, and more. The deadline for hotel room reservations is December 22, 2009.

Questions about the hotel and meeting space should be directed to Debbie Justus-Thompson, AFL-CIO, at 202-637-5228.

Remembering labor’s greatest champion

Monday, November 30 was the 79th anniversary of the death of the great Mary Harris “Mother” Jones. Thanks to Con Carbon for sharing this with us, a remembrance of Mother by Saul Schniderman, president of AFSCME Local 2910 at the Library of Congress:

Irish-born Mother Jones was one of the most well-known women of the 20th century. She was called “the Joan of Arc of the Labor Movement,” “the Miners’ Angel,” “the Most Dangerous Woman in America” and, in her later years, the “Grand Old Champion of Labor.” Throughout her long life she spread the gospel of unionism, organizing workers throughout the country, often sleeping in union halls or on the floor of a coal miner’s home. She once told a congressional committee, “my address is like my shoes, it travels with me. I abide where there is fight against slavery.”

[...]

In 1910 Mother Jones said, “Some day we will have the courage to rise up and strike back against these great ‘giants’ of industry, and then we will see that they weren’t giants at all — they only seemed so because we were on our knees and they towered over us.” If she were alive today, Mother Jones would challenge us to protest against today’s corporate giants who exploit us at work, pollute our environment and teach our children that the most important thing in life is what you look like and how much money you own.

If she were alive today, Mother Jones would urge us to speak out, to organize and to “raise some hell.”

Let’s not disappoint her.

Read the full post about how Mother Jones spent the last years of her life and how she is memorialized today in Adelphia, MD at the Chicago Women’s
Liberation Union web site.

It is with great sadness that we are sharing the news of the passing of Donny Brown of IBT 391 in Greensboro. Donny served his union and its members at UPS in Greensboro for many years. On Wednesday he died from a stroke at age 48.

The family has made the following arrangements:

There will be a wake on Monday, November 30th from 6:00-8:00pm at the Genesis Baptist Church, 2812 E. Bessemer Ave, Greensboro, NC.

The viewing will be held on Tuesday, December 1st at 12:30pm at the Love and Faith Christian Fellowship Church, 4344 Blackberry Rd, Greensboro, NC. The funeral will follow at 1:00pm, and then a repass will be held inside the church after the burial.

Flowers can be sent to the Woodard Funeral Home, 3200 N. O’Henry Blvd, Greensboro, NC 27405. The number for the funeral home is 336-621-3461.

If you have any questions about this information, please contact IBT 391 Secretary-Treasurer Vernon Gammon by phone at 336-613-2950 or email to vgammon@teamsterslocal391.org.

We add to our list of many things to be thankful for this time of year a special thanks for having known Donny Brown. Our heartfelt condolences go out to Donny’s family. Our thoughts are with them all, as they are also with his many friends and colleagues, including all of our brothers and sisters at Local 391.

The slow, deliberative path to the end begins

Late last Saturday, the Senate voted 60-39 to open debate on historic health care and health insurance reform legislation. Having cleared this procedural vote, debate is set to begin after Thanksgiving.

Senator Kay Hagan voted with the rest of the Democratic caucus to debate the most important domestic policy issue of our time. Senator Richard Burr voted not to have the debate at all. Call your Senators about their votes.

While it’s a big deal and a victory for reform that the Senate will debate a comprehensive reform bill, the bill is flawed because it includes a new tax on workers’ health care benefits.

Our message to the Senate is this:

• Include a strong public health insurance option to foster competition and lower costs. Don’t force uninsured Americans to become customers of greedy private health insurance companies. Give them the option.
• Employers have to do their part and should be required either to provide health care for their employees or pay into a system to make sure everyone is covered.
• No new costs or taxes that would hurt working families.

Making the case for change with just the facts

The Department of Health and Human services has released state-by-state reporting on the impact of proposed health insurance legislation making it’s way through the Congress. Go to www.healthreform.gov for details.

For North Carolina, health insurance reform means immediate relief for seniors and working families. As early as next year, consumer protections will abolish life time limits, pre-existing conditions, and rescission – the practice of dropping your coverage when you get sick. Reforms will ensure free preventative services and the creation of a high risk insurance pool for folks that cannot now get affordable coverage.

Seniors can look forward to more efficient Medicare services and lower premiums by reducing overpayments to private plans. For example, Medicare recipients pay about $90 more per year than than is necessary because of these excessive payments. Seniors will also receive a 50% discount on brand name drugs. Co payments for preventative services on Medicare will be eliminated.

112,000 small businesses would receive tax credits to make offering health insurance to their employees feasible for the first time.

Currently, people with health insurance pay a hidden tax in the form of higher premiums to cover the uncompensated care provided to people without insurance. This includes everyone, even state employees who pay premiums for their Blue Cross Blue Shield insurance. Health insurance reform will bring more premium payers into the system, thereby reducing or eliminating this hidden tax.

Reform will help as many as 951,000 North Carolina residents who pay for their own insurance today and will be eligible for premium credits to reduce their out-of-pocket expenses.

Visit www.healthreform.gov for more information about what health insurance reform would mean for North Carolina – or any other state in the union.

Remember the less fortunate when giving thanks this week

On Thursday most Americans will celebrate Thanksgiving with feasting and time spent with friends and family. Unfortunately, too many Americans will go hungry.

The USDA recently reported that a lack of food security for families increased to record levels in 2008. Low food security is defined by an undependable access to food. At very low levels, people go hungry. Last year, 21% of families with children had low or very low food security in the United States.

High unemployment and underemployment means more Americans are in need, and many never thought they’d need assistance. “As many as 70 percent of our clients now are white-collar workers,” says Mary Montford who directs the Raleigh APRI food bank. “They used to have high paying jobs, have college degrees, a house, kids in school, and for the first time in their lives, they need the help.”

The period between Thanksgiving and Christmas is when food banks and food pantries take in most of their donations for the year. This year is no different, but at the same time, the need is also greater than ever before. Today alone, the Raleigh APRI food bank fed twenty families, says Montford:

“The average was 3 kids per family plus one parent. All in all, we probably fed about 100 people today, and we try to do 3 to 4 weeks worth of food at a time. Also, every family today got what they needed for a Thanksgiving dinner – including a turkey. Many didn’t think they could have Thanksgiving this year, and now they can.”

Montford estimates she spent $700 to restock the food bank in preparation for the Thanksgiving holiday. “I’ve got two months to raise the money to pay off these bills, but that’s OK. The folks who we feed need that help now.”

If you would like to support the work of the Raleigh APRI food bank, you can do so with a check made payable to: Raleigh APRI, 1408 Hillsborough St, Raleigh, NC 27605 and write ‘food bank’ in the memo line.