» SCOTUS Unleashes Corporate Power in Elections «
Fri Jan 29 2010 | Comments (0)
‘Citizens United’ ruling a disaster for democracy
If we thought the flow of money in politics was bad before, we ain’t seen nothing yet.
Last week, in a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court of the United States elevated corporations to the level of actual persons with a free-speech guarantee under the first amendment to advocate for the election or defeat of candidates. This was the work of activist conservative judges, ignoring precedent and invalidating over a century of established campaign finance law dating back to the trust-busting days of Teddy Roosevelt.
The ruling frees companies like health insurance reform villain Blue Cross Blue Shield of NC, Big Oil companies like Exxon Mobil, and major Wall Street banks like Goldman Sachs to spend whatever it takes to make sure candidates friendly to their interests win at the ballot box.
Even more dangerous than mega-companies being able to right a blank check to buy an election, the ruling leaves the door open to foreign controlled corporations and foreign sovereign wealth to pour into the United States.
The ruling on constitutional grounds invalidates state and local laws, too – like those on the books in North Carolina which prohibited corporations from this type of electioneering.
Ostensibly, the ruling applies to unions and other non-profits because we are also corporations, albeit of a different kind than for-profit multinationals with literally billions of dollars to spend to protect their interests. In reality, there’s no comparison to the economic power (now turned political power) of these companies.
Here’s the AFL-CIO’s statement on the Citizens United ruling:
By allowing unlimited corporate treasury expenditures that explicitly support or oppose particular candidates, the Court has increased the already excessive influence corporations exert in our electoral system. And we believe the Court wrongly treated corporate expenditures the same as union expenditures, contrary to the arguments we made in our brief in this case. Unions, unlike business, are democratically-controlled, non-profit member organizations representing working men and women across the country, and their independent speech should accordingly be given greater protection.
The AFL-CIO supports a system of campaign finance regulation that promotes democratic participation in elections by individuals and their associations; protects legitimate independent speech rights; offers public financing to candidates while firmly regulating contributions to them; and guarantees effective disclosure of who is paying for what.
Of course, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is also a non-profit member organization – one to which it’s member corporations are now free to give whatever amount of money they see fit to push a pro-corporate, free trade, anti-worker, and anti-environment agenda at the ballot box.










“When a man tells you that he got rich through hard work, ask him whose.”
By Fred Azcarate, Voice@Work Director for the AFL-CIO
Labor racks up big wins for working families in N.C.
James Andrews with Barack Obama before a campaign rally in Greensboro earlier this year
Kay Hagan at our 2008 Convention

First time voters benefit from a helping hand
Elsewhere, Annette Farrington (pictured left), who is partially disabled, didn’t think she would be able to participate in this historic election. Thankfully, Zita Dixon of the Service Employees Union paid her a visit.
Cliff Ayers of Eden, NC











On July 16, labor leaders from around the state met at the state fed headquarters to discuss plans for our Labor 2008 program. The meeting laid out the groundwork and timeline for running a successful member-to-member political education program.
NC State AFL-CIO endorsed candidate for state Commissioner of Labor, Mary Fant Donnan, won her runoff election decisively on June 24. Turnout in the runoff was extremely low, amounting to under 2% of registered voters statewide. Nevertheless, Donnan won 2 to 1 with about 22,000 votes more than her opponent.
2008 will surely be the most expensive election in history, and political parties at every level will need to raise and spend vast sums of money to secure victories in November.
The Colombia Free Trade Agreement (FTA) represents a continuation of the Bush administration’s failed trade policies, an agenda that has contributed to the loss of more than 3 million manufacturing jobs since 2000, skyrocketing trade deficits and shrinking paychecks.
Recent Comments
What our readers are saying on aflcionc.org:
Jimmy Whales
Cathy Daniels Lee
Jeremy
Ned Kennington
Lisa Carter